3-Slide Brief · For Producers and Editors

PRAMS: The Executive Summary

The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System has been killed without being killed. Three slides on the landscape, why it matters, and what Labora is building to replace what was lost. Print-to-PDF for pitching.

Slide 1 of 3 · The Landscape

A thirty-eight-year-old federal data system has been quietly liquidated.

The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is the CDC-coordinated, state-administered surveillance instrument that has, since 1987, sent a survey to new mothers in 46 jurisdictions covering 81 percent of U.S. live births, asking what actually happened during their pregnancies. CDC credits PRAMS with helping drive the U.S. infant mortality rate from 10 per 1,000 live births in 1987 to 5.5 per 1,000 by 2022.

What changed

Apr 1, 2025
Entire PRAMS team RIF'd
13 months
On administrative leave · none rehired
2023 data
Finished · never released

The team was not formally dismissed; the program was not formally ended. The federal grants funding state-level data collection expired April 30, 2026. The CDC published OMB extension paperwork in November 2025 and a "Revision" reclassification in March 2026 — moving the paperwork forward while no one operates the program. HHS told Mississippi Today the agency would share PRAMS data "at a later time."

There is a way to kill a federal program without admitting you killed it. You send everyone home on "administrative leave," you keep the paperwork moving, and a year later you say the data will be released "at a later time."
Slide 2 of 3 · Why It Matters

PRAMS captured three things no other federal data source can.

Pregnancy intention

Roughly 40 percent of U.S. pregnancies are reported as unintended at conception. PRAMS is the only federal source asking that question at population scale. Death certificates do not capture intention. Hospital records do not capture intention. PRAMS asked the woman.

Race-stratified data on lived experience

Vital records capture race at birth and death. They do not capture what happened in pregnancy. PRAMS asked Black, white, Asian, AI/AN, Hispanic, and multiracial mothers the same questions about prenatal care access, provider treatment, mental health screening, and postpartum follow-up. The instrument was the empirical baseline for every disparities-reduction policy of the last twenty years.

Lived experience

Intimate partner violence (with the 2016 expansion to include "my ex-husband or ex-partner" as a perpetrator category). Postpartum depression screening. Contraceptive access at pregnancy. Postpartum care discontinuity. Substance use. COVID-19 experiences. The disability module (2019–2020). The opioid callback survey (2019–2020). Social determinants of health added 2022.

Death certificates count corpses. Hospital records count what was billed. PRAMS counted experience.

The pattern, named

PRAMS did not fall alone. The same April 1 RIF eliminated the MEC contraceptive guidelines team, the ART/IVF surveillance team, and the ERASE MM-supporting infrastructure. Two of three branches of CDC's Division of Reproductive Health were structurally eliminated. NIH terminated 1,392 grants worth approximately $1.7 billion by April 2026, with NIMHD losing 29.6 percent of its previously active funding — the largest proportional cut of any NIH institute (Liu et al., JAMA, May 2025). The Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act was retitled the "Momnibus Act" with "Black" appearing once across the text. A six-page HHS list of nearly 200 banned words includes "Black," "women," "disability," "tribal," and "trauma."

Slide 3 of 3 · What Labora Is Doing

The methodological pivot to all-cause mortality and hospital utilization.

When the gold-standard instrument is suppressed, the surveillance frame must shift. Labora's methodological pivot is to all-cause mortality among women ages 15–44 plus hospital utilization proxies. The pivot is externally validated.

Commonwealth Fund, July 2025: state-level pregnancy-related mortality ratios mirror all-cause female 15–44 mortality, r = +0.59. Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee — high on both. California, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Utah — low on both.

The six-layer proxy stack

The deliverable

A quarterly state-level scorecard with six columns. A state where O-coded maternal mortality is declining while the other five columns are rising is a state where deaths are being miscoded or undercaptured. That divergence is the Labora finding.

The build

Pilot release Q3 2026 for California, New York, Mississippi, Texas, Ohio. Scaled to all 50 states by year-end. Methodology paper with Eugene Declercq (Boston University), Marie Thoma (Maryland), Jamie Daw (Columbia) as candidate co-authors. Publishable in Health Affairs Scholar or AJPH Forum.

None of this replaces PRAMS. What it does is keep the field from going blind while the instrument is rebuilt.